🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."